b'SUPERIOR COURT: Overall Court PerformancePast 12 Years Comparison of External Partners and Judges/Employees(in percentages and mean scores1)100% Superior Court Superior Court5% 5% 490% 18%80% 25%70% Poor 3 2.9 360%50% 47% 54% Fair40% Good30% 220% Excellent10% 23% 24%0% 1External Partners Judges/Employees External Partners (n=300) Judges/Employees (n=352)(n=300) (n=352)1 Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Mean scores are based on a 4-point rating scale: 4 = Excellent, 3 = Good, 2 = Fair, 1 = Poor. 2.5 is the midpoint of the rating scale.The differences in mean scores are not statistically significant. JUVENILE COURTOverall Court PerformancePast 12 Years Comparison of External Partners and Judges/Employees(in percentages and mean scores1)Juvenile Court Juvenile Court100% 7% 7% 490%17%80% 28%70% Poor 3 2.9 360%50% 37% 50% Fair40% Good30% 220% Excellent10% 28% 26%0% 1External Partners Judges/Employees External Partners (n=137) Judges/Employees (n=258)(n=137) (n=258)1 Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding. Mean scores are based on a 4-point rating scale: 4 = Excellent, 3 = Good, 2 = Fair, 1 = Poor. 2.5 is the midpoint of the rating scale.The differences in mean scores are not statistically significant. 20232027 Strategic PlanSuperior, Juvenile, and Justice Courts, Pima County 25'